Mitral prosthesis and methods for implantation

ABSTRACT

Apparatus and methods are provided including a mitral valve prosthesis. The prosthesis includes an inner support structure having downstream and upstream sections, the upstream section having a cross-sectional area greater than the downstream section. The inner support structure is configured to be positioned on an atrial side of the native valve complex, and to prevent the prosthesis from being dislodged into the left ventricle. A prosthetic valve having prosthetic valve leaflets is coupled to the inner support structure. An outer support structure has engagement arms, downstream ends of the engagement arms being coupled to the inner support structure. The prosthesis is configured such that, upon implantation thereof:
         downstream ends of the native valve leaflets,   downstream ends of the engagement arms, and   downstream ends of the prosthetic leaflets,   are disposed at a longitudinal distance from one another of less than 3 mm. Other embodiments are also described.

CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. ProvisionalApplication 61/307,743, filed Feb. 24, 2010, entitled, “Mitralprosthesis and methods for implantation,” which is incorporated hereinby reference.

FIELD OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Some applications of the present invention generally relate toimplantable medical apparatus. Specifically, some applications of thepresent invention relate to apparatus and methods associated withprosthetic heart valves.

BACKGROUND

The mitral valve exhibits two types of pathologies regurgitation andstenosis. Regurgitation is the more common of the two defects. Eitherdefect may be treated by surgical repair. Under certain conditions, themitral valve must be replaced. Standard approaches to mitral valvereplacement require cutting open the left side of the heart to accessthe native mitral valve.

US 2008/0071368 to Tuval describes a prosthesis for implantation at anative semilunar valve of a native valve complex. The prosthesisincludes a distal fixation member, configured to be positioned in adownstream artery, and shaped so as to define exactly three proximalengagement arms that are configured to be positioned at least partiallywithin respective ones of semilunar sinuses, and, in combination, toapply, to tissue that defines the semilunar sinuses, a first axial forcedirected toward a ventricle. The prosthesis further includes a proximalfixation member coupled to the distal fixation member, the proximalfixation member configured to be positioned at least partially on aventricular side of the native semilunar valve, and to apply, to theventricular side of the native valve complex, a second axial forcedirected toward the downstream artery, such that application of thefirst and second forces couples the prosthesis to the native valvecomplex.

US 2009/0276040 to Rowe describes a prosthetic mitral valve assembly andmethod of inserting the same. In certain embodiments, the prostheticmitral valve assembly has a flared upper end and a tapered portion tofit the contours of the native mitral valve. The prosthetic mitral valveassembly can include a stent or outer support frame with a valve mountedtherein. The assembly is described as being adapted to expand radiallyoutwardly and into contact with the native tissue to create a pressurefit. One embodiment is described including positioning the mitral valveassembly below the annulus such that the annulus itself can restrict theassembly from moving in an upward direction towards the left atrium. Themitral valve assembly is also described as being positioned so that theleaflets of the mitral valve hold the assembly to prevent downwardmovement of the assembly towards the left ventricle.

US 2010/0217382 to Chau describes a prosthetic mitral valve assembly andmethod of inserting the same. In certain embodiments, the prostheticmitral valve assembly includes a stent and valve combination. The stentis designed so that the anchoring portion is positioned above theannulus of the mitral valve and in the left atrium. The stent isradially expandable so that it can expand into position against thewalls of the left atrium and accommodate a wide range of anatomies.Contact between the stent and the native tissue in the left atrium isdescribed as reducing paravalvular leakage and preventing migration ofthe stent once in place.

US 2009/0005863 to Goetz describes a replacement valve for implantationcentrally within the orifice of a malfunctioning native heart valve. Thevalve is designed for minimally invasive entry through an intercostalopening in the chest of a patient and an opening in the apex of thehuman heart. The replacement valve includes either a separate anchor ora combined anchor that folds around the malfunctioning native valveleaflets, sandwiching them in a manner so as to securely anchor thereplacement valve in a precise, desired location.

US 2009/0216312 to Straubinger describes a stent for the positioning andanchoring of a valvular prosthesis in an implantation site in the heartof a patient. Specifically, the Straubinger application relates to anexpandable stent for an endoprosthesis used in the treatment of anarrowing of a cardiac valve and/or a cardiac valve insufficiency. Thestent is described as comprising at least one fastening portion viawhich the valvular prosthesis is connectable to the stent, so as toensure that no longitudinal displacement of a valvular prosthesisfastened to a stent will occur relative the stent in the implanted stateof the stent, even given the peristaltic motion of the heart. The stentfurther comprises positioning arches and retaining arches, whereby atleast one positioning arch is connected to at least one retaining archvia a first connecting web. The stent moreover comprises at least oneauxiliary retaining arch which connects the respective arms of the atleast one retaining arch connected to the at least one positioning arch.

US 2008/0255660 to Guyenot describes a medical device for treating aheart valve insufficiency, with an endoprosthesis which can beintroduced into a patient's body and expanded to secure a heart valveprosthesis in the patient's aorta. In an embodiment, the endoprosthesishas a plurality of positioning arches configured to be positioned withrespect to a patient's aorta and a plurality of retaining arches tosupport a heart valve prosthesis. The endoprosthesis includes a firstcollapsed mode during the process of introducing it into the patient'sbody and a second expanded mode when it is implanted.

The following references may be of interest

-   US 2010/0030330 to Bobo-   US 2009/0216313 to Straubinger-   US 2009/0216310 to Straubinger-   US 2008/0255661 to Straubinger-   US 2008/0208328 to Antocci-   US 2008/0071369 to Tuval-   US 2008/0071363 to Tuval-   US 2008/0071366 to Tuval-   US 2008/0071362 to Tuval-   US 2008/0071361 to Tuval-   US 2003/0036791 to Bonhoeffer-   WO 04/019825 to Figulla

SUMMARY OF EMBODIMENTS

For some applications of the present invention, mitral valve prosthesesand methods for implanting the prostheses are provided. The prosthesesare typically implanted transcatheterally, for example, transapically(i.e., through the apex of the heart), transatrially (i.e., through theleft atrium of the heart), and/or transseptally (i.e., through theseptum of the heart). The prostheses typically include inner and outersupport structures, the outer support structure including engagementarms. A valve prosthesis is typically sutured to the inner supportstructure.

Typically, the prostheses are placed on the native mitral valve complexsuch that the native leaflets are disposed between the inner supportstructure and the engagement arms. For some applications, such aconfiguration prevents the native leaflets from obstructing flow throughthe left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), prevents the native leafletsfrom interacting with the prosthetic leaflets, recruits the nativeleaflets in minimizing peri-valvular leaks, maintains proper alignmentof the valve prosthesis, avoids systolic anterior mobility, and/ormaintains valve stability by preventing migration of the valve into theatrium or ventricle. For some applications, the design of the prosthesisis similar to the native valve and supports a non-round in vivoconfiguration, which reflects native valve function.

There is therefore provided, in accordance with some applications of thepresent invention, apparatus including a mitral valve prosthesis forimplantation at a native mitral valve complex of a subject, theprosthesis including:

an inner support structure having a downstream section and an upstreamsection, the upstream section having a cross-sectional area greater thanthe downstream section, the inner support structure being configured tobe positioned at least partially on an atrial side of the native valvecomplex, and to prevent the prosthesis from being dislodged into a leftventricle by applying an axial force directed toward the left ventricle;

a prosthetic valve having prosthetic valve leaflets coupled to the innersupport structure; and

an outer support structure having two or more engagement arms,downstream ends of the engagement arms being coupled to the innersupport structure,

the prosthesis being configured such that, upon implantation thereof:

-   -   downstream ends of native valve leaflets of the native mitral        valve complex,    -   the downstream ends of the engagement arms, and    -   downstream ends of the prosthetic leaflets,

are disposed at a longitudinal distance from one another of less than 3mm, the longitudinal distance being measured in a direction of alongitudinal axis of the prosthesis.

For some applications, the downstream ends of the engagement arms arecoupled to the inner support structure within 3 mm of a downstream endof the inner support structure.

For some applications, the prosthesis is configured such that, uponimplantation thereof, no portion of the prosthesis protrudes into a leftventricle of the subject by more than 3 mm.

For some applications, the engagement arms are integrally formed withthe inner support structure.

For some applications, the prosthesis is configured such that, uponimplantation thereof:

-   -   the downstream ends of native valve leaflets of the native        mitral valve complex,    -   the downstream ends of the engagement arms, and    -   the downstream ends of the prosthetic leaflets,

are disposed at a longitudinal distance from one another of less than 1mm, the longitudinal distance being measured in a direction of alongitudinal axis of the prosthesis.

For some applications, the prosthesis is configured such that, uponimplantation thereof, no portion of the prosthesis protrudes into a leftventricle of the subject by more than 1 mm.

For some applications, the downstream ends of the engagement arms arecoupled to the inner support structure within 1 mm of a downstream endof the inner support structure.

For some applications, for each engagement arm, along at least 30% of alength of the engagement arm, the engagement arm is at a distance of atleast 0.5 mm from an outer surface of the inner support structure.

For some applications, the distance is at least 1 mm.

For some applications, the distance is at least 4 mm.

For some applications, the engagement arm is at the distance from theouter surface of the inner support structure along at least 50% of thelength of the engagement arm.

For some applications, the engagement arm is at the distance from theouter surface of the inner support structure along at least 70% of thelength of the engagement arm.

For some applications, the outer support structure further includes aconnecting frame, the connecting frame of the outer support structurebeing configured to be coupled to the inner support structure.

For some applications, the inner support structure is shaped to define aplurality of cells, and the connecting frame of the outer supportstructure is shaped to define a plurality of cells having shapes andsizes that match cells of the inner support structure.

For some applications, the prosthesis is configured, upon implantationthereof, to reduce motion of the native valve leaflets, by holding theleaflets inside the engagement arms.

For some applications, the prosthesis is configured to immobilize thenative valve leaflets, by holding the leaflets inside the engagementarms.

For some applications, the prosthesis is configured to prevent systolicanterior motion of the native valve leaflets, by holding the leafletsinside the engagement arms.

For some applications, the prosthesis is configured to prevent thenative leaflets from interfering with LVOT, by holding the leafletsinside the engagement arms.

For some applications, the outer support structure further includescovers for covering the engagement arms, the covers being configured toreduce the motion of the native leaflets.

There is further provided, in accordance with some applications of thepresent invention apparatus including a mitral valve prosthesis forimplantation at a native mitral valve complex of a subject, theprosthesis including:

an inner support structure having a downstream section, and an upstreamsection, wherein the upstream section has a cross-sectional area greaterthan the downstream section, the inner support structure beingconfigured to be positioned at least partially on an atrial side of thenative valve complex, and to apply an axial force directed toward a leftventricle; and

an outer support structure having posterior and anterior engagement armsconfigured to be placed over, respectively, posterior and anteriorleaflets of the native mitral valve complex, wherein the engagement armsare coupled to the inner support structure,

wherein a ratio of a length of the anterior engagement arm to a lengthof the posterior arm is between 1.1:1 and 15:1.

For some applications, the ratio is between 1.3:1 and 2:1.

For some applications, the length of the anterior engagement arm isbetween 2 mm and 35 mm.

For some applications, the length of the anterior engagement arm isbetween 15 mm and 25 mm.

For some applications, the length of the posterior engagement arm isbetween 2 mm and 35 mm.

For some applications, the length of the posterior engagement arm isbetween 7 mm and 23 mm.

There is additionally provided, in accordance with some applications ofthe present invention, apparatus including a mitral valve prosthesis forimplantation at a native mitral valve complex of a subject, theprosthesis including:

an inner support structure having a downstream section, and an upstreamsection, wherein the upstream section has a cross-sectional area greaterthan the downstream section, the inner support structure beingconfigured to be positioned at least partially on an atrial side of thenative valve complex, and to apply an axial force directed toward a leftventricle; and

an outer support structure having posterior and anterior engagement armsconfigured to be placed over native leaflets of the native mitral valvecomplex, wherein the engagement arms are coupled to the inner supportstructure,

the engagement arms being configured to define first configurationsthereof during implantation of the prosthesis, and to change shape so asto define second configurations thereof, subsequent to being placed overthe native leaflets of the native mitral valve complex,

each of the engagement arms spanning a width of less than 12 mm in thefirst configuration thereof, and spanning a width of more than 15 mmwhen in the second configuration thereof.

For some applications, in the first configuration thereof, theengagement arms are configured to span a width of less than 8 mm.

For some applications, in the second configuration thereof, theengagement arms are configured to span a width of more than 35 mm.

For some applications, in the first configuration thereof, theengagement arms are configured to facilitate functioning of the nativevalve complex during implantation of the prosthesis.

For some applications, in the first configuration thereof, theengagement arms are configured to fit between papillary muscles of thenative valve complex.

There is additionally provided in accordance with some applications ofthe present invention apparatus including a mitral valve prosthesis forimplantation at a native mitral valve complex of a subject, theprosthesis including:

an inner support structure having a downstream section and an upstreamsection, the upstream section having a cross-sectional area greater thanthe downstream section, the inner support structure being configured tobe positioned at least partially on an atrial side of the native valvecomplex, and to prevent the prosthesis from being dislodged into a leftventricle by applying an axial force directed toward the left ventricle;

an outer support structure having two or more engagement arms,downstream ends of the engagement arms being coupled to the innersupport structure, and

a prosthetic valve having prosthetic valve leaflets coupled to the innersupport structure such that downstream ends of the prosthetic valveleaflets are within 3 mm of the downstream ends of the engagement arms;

a longitudinal distance from a downstream end to an upstream end of eachof the engagement arms being less than 18 mm, the longitudinal distancebeing measured in a direction of a longitudinal axis of the prosthesis.

For some applications, the prosthetic valve leaflets are coupled to theinner support structure such that downstream ends of the prostheticvalve leaflets are within 1 mm of the downstream ends of the engagementarms.

For some applications, the longitudinal distance from the downstream endto the upstream end of each of the engagement arms is less than 12 mm.

For some applications, the longitudinal distance from the downstream endto the upstream end of each of the engagement arms is less than 10 mm.

For some applications, the downstream ends of the engagement arms arecoupled to the inner support structure within 3 mm of a downstream endof the inner support structure.

For some applications, the downstream ends of the engagement arms arecoupled to the inner support structure within 1 mm of a downstream endof the inner support structure.

There is further provided, in accordance with some applications of thepresent invention apparatus including a mitral valve prosthesis forimplantation at a native mitral valve complex of a subject, theprosthesis including:

an inner support structure having a downstream section and an upstreamsection, the upstream section having a cross-sectional area greater thanthe downstream section, the inner support structure being configured tobe positioned at least partially on an atrial side of the native valvecomplex, and to prevent the prosthesis from being dislodged into a leftventricle by applying an axial force directed toward the left ventricle;

a prosthetic valve having prosthetic valve leaflets coupled to the innersupport structure; and

an outer support structure having two or more engagement arms, theengagement arms being coupled to the inner support structure,

the prosthesis being configured such that, upon implantation thereof:

-   -   downstream ends of native valve leaflets of the native mitral        valve complex, and downstream ends of the engagement arms are        disposed at a longitudinal distance from one another of less        than 3 mm, the longitudinal distance being measured in a        direction of a longitudinal axis of the prosthesis, and    -   a downstream end of the inner support structure and downstream        ends of the prosthetic valve leaflets are at a longitudinal        distance of at least 4 mm upstream of the downstream ends of the        native valve leaflets, the longitudinal distance being measured        in a direction of a longitudinal axis of the prosthesis.

For some applications, the prosthesis is configured such that, uponimplantation thereof, the downstream end of the inner support structureand the downstream ends of the prosthetic valve leaflets are at alongitudinal distance of at least 10 mm upstream of the downstream endsof the native valve leaflets.

There is additionally provided in accordance with some applications ofthe present invention apparatus including a mitral valve prosthesis forimplantation at a native mitral valve complex of a subject, theprosthesis including:

an inner support structure having a downstream section and an upstreamsection, the upstream section having a cross-sectional area greater thanthe downstream section, the inner support structure being configured tobe positioned at least partially on an atrial side of the native valvecomplex, and to prevent the prosthesis from being dislodged into a leftventricle by applying an axial force directed toward the left ventricle;

an outer support structure having two or more engagement arms, theengagement arms being coupled to the inner support structure, and

a prosthetic valve having prosthetic valve leaflets coupled to the innersupport structure such that downstream ends of the prosthetic valveleaflets are at least 4 mm upstream of the downstream ends of theengagement arms.

For some applications, the prosthetic valve leaflets are coupled to theinner support structure such that the downstream ends of the prostheticvalve leaflets are at least 10 mm upstream of the downstream ends of theengagement arms.

The present invention will be more fully understood from the followingdetailed description of embodiments thereof, taken together with thedrawings, in which:

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A-D are schematic illustration of respective views of a mitralvalve prosthesis, in accordance with some applications of the presentinvention;

FIGS. 2A-D are schematic illustrations of respective views of a mitralvalve prosthesis, in accordance with some applications of the presentinvention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of an inner expandable supportstructure of the prosthesis, in accordance with some applications of thepresent invention;

FIGS. 4A-F are schematic illustrations of mitral prostheses, inaccordance with some applications of the present invention;

FIGS. 5A-B are schematic illustrations of the inner expandable supportstructure of the prosthesis, in accordance with some applications of thepresent invention;

FIGS. 6A-D are schematic illustrations of the inner expandable supportstructure of the prosthesis, in accordance with some applications of thepresent invention;

FIGS. 7A-F are schematic illustrations of respective steps of atransapical implantation procedure of the mitral valve prosthesis, inaccordance with some applications of the present invention;

FIGS. 8A-F are schematic illustrations of respective steps of atransatrial implantation procedure of the mitral valve prosthesis, inaccordance with some applications of the present invention;

FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of an implanted mitral valveprosthesis, in accordance with some applications of the presentinvention;

FIGS. 10A-D are schematic illustrations of the engagement arms of themitral valve prosthesis, in accordance with respective applications ofthe present invention;

FIGS. 11A-D are schematic illustrations of an engagement arm assembly,in accordance with some applications of the present invention;

FIG. 12 is a schematic illustration of the mitral valve prosthesis, inaccordance with some applications of the present invention;

FIG. 13 is a schematic illustration of the mitral valve prosthesis, inaccordance with some applications of the present invention;

FIGS. 14A-B are schematic illustrations of the mitral valve prosthesis,in accordance with some applications of the present invention; and

FIGS. 15A-B are schematic illustrations of the mitral valve prosthesis,in accordance with some applications of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Reference is now made to FIGS. 1A-D, which are schematic illustrationsof respective views of a mitral valve prosthesis 100, in accordance withsome applications of the present invention.

Mitral valve prosthesis 100 includes an inner support structure 102 andan outer support structure 104. Outer support structure 104 includesouter engagement arms (i.e., outer support arms) 106. As shown, mitralvalve prosthesis 100 typically includes two outer engagement arms 106 toanatomically match the native mitral valve leaflets 107 (shown in FIG.1B).

Sutured to inner support structure 102 is a prosthetic valve 118. Forsome applications, valve 118 is coupled to inner support structure 102,and/or to engagement arms 106 in accordance with techniques described inUS 2008/0071368 to Tuval, which is incorporated herein by reference.Valve 118 can be formed of a biocompatible synthetic material, syntheticpolymer, an autograft tissue, xenograft tissue, or other alternativematerials. Valve 118 is a bi-leaflet bovine pericardium valve, atri-leaflet valve, or any other suitable valve (e.g., a valve having adifferent number of leaflets).

Mitral-valve prosthesis 100 is typically placed at the subject's nativemitral valve complex 128, as shown in FIG. 1D. As used herein, includingin the claims, the “native mitral valve complex” includes the nativevalve leaflets, the annulus of the valve, chordae tendineae, andpapillary muscles. Inner support structure 102 and engagement arms 106facilitate fixation of the mitral valve prosthesis with respect tonative mitral valve complex 128. Prosthetic valve 118 functions in agenerally similar manner to a healthy native mitral valve, i.e., theprosthetic valve:

-   -   opens during diastole to permit the flow of blood from the        subject's left atrium to the subject's left ventricle, and    -   closes during systole to prevent the backflow of blood in the        upstream direction from the subject's left ventricle to the        subject's left atrium.

FIG. 1C shows prosthetic valve 118 in a closed state thereof (i.e.,during systole). The prosthetic valve shown in FIG. 1C has threeleaflets, although as described hereinabove, for some applications,valve 118 has a different number of leaflets.

As shown in FIG. 1B, upon implantation, mitral valve prosthesis 100 isplaced such that native mitral valve leaflets 107 are disposed betweenouter engagement arms 106 and inner support structure 102. The outerengagement arms embrace, without squeezing, leaflets of the nativevalve. Typically there is a space between the engagement arms and theinner support structure, such that native valve leaflets are notsqueezed. For example, along at least 30% of length L of the engagementarm, the engagement arm is separated from the inner support structure bya distance D of at least 0.5 mm. For some applications, the engagementarm is separated from the inner support structure by a distance 13 of atleast 0.5 mm along at least 50% or 70% of length L of the engagementarm. For some applications, the aforementioned distance D by which theengagement arm is separated from the inner support structure is greaterthan 1 mm or greater than 4 mm.

Each outer engagement arm 106 is typically downwardly concave (i.e.,concave in a downstream direction) at the region of the outer engagementarm that is adjacent to a downstream section 112 of inner supportstructure 102, when viewed from outside of the outer support structure,as shown in FIG. 1B, for example. The downstream ends of the engagementarms typically meet at commissure posts 108 (shown in FIG. 1A). For someapplications, the engagement arms are coupled to the inner supportstructure at the commissure posts. Alternatively or additionally, theengagement arms, and/or the inner support structure is coupled toprosthetic valve 118 at the commissure posts, for example, in accordancewith techniques described in US 2008/0071368 to Tuval, which isincorporated herein by reference. For some applications, mitral valveprosthesis 100 includes three engagement arms 106, three leaflets,and/or three commissure posts 108, or a different number of theaforementioned components.

Typically, engagement arms 106 facilitate the anchoring and/ororientation of the mitral valve prosthesis at the desired implantationsite. In particular, the engagement arms prevent mitral valve prosthesis100 from being dislodged upstream of native mitral valve complex 128(e.g., when valve 118 is closed during systole and an upstream force isexerted on prosthesis 100). This is achieved, because, in response toupstream-directed blood flow pushing the valve prosthesis in theupstream direction (e.g., during systole), tissue of leaflets 107 of thenative mitral valve complex exerts a downstream-directed force F1 (shownin FIG. 1B) on the engagement arms. For some applications (e.g., for theconfiguration of prosthesis 100 shown in FIGS. 4E-F), downstream ends ofthe native valve leaflets exert the downstream directed force ondownstream portions of the engagements arms, i.e., at the portion of theengagement arms at which the engagement arms form shoulders with innersupport structure 102.

Typically, downstream ends 105 of engagement arms 106 are within 3 mm(e.g., within 1 mm) of downstream ends 119 of prosthetic leaflets 118(see FIG. 1A), when measured in the direction of the longitudinal axisof the prosthesis. Further typically, upon implantation of theprosthesis, downstream ends 105 of engagement arms 106 are within 3 mm(e.g., within 1 mm) of downstream ends of the native valve leaflets 107(see FIG. 1B). Thus, downstream ends of the engagement arms, downstreamends of the native valve leaflets, and downstream ends of the prostheticvalve leaflets are all typically within 3 mm (e.g., within 1 mm) of eachother, when measured in the direction of the longitudinal axis of theprosthesis. Typically, this is achieved because (a) the prosthetic valveleaflets are coupled to the inner support structure such that downstreamends of the prosthetic valve leaflets are within 3 mm (e.g., within 3mm) of the downstream ends of the engagement arms, and (b) longitudinaldistance D1 (shown in FIG. 1B) from a downstream end 105 to an upstreamend 109 of each of the engagement arms is less than 18 mm (e.g., lessthan 12 mm, or less than 10 mm), the longitudinal distance beingmeasured in a direction of a longitudinal axis of the prosthesis.Further typically, the downstream ends of the engagement arms arecoupled to the inner support structure within 3 mm (e.g., within 1 mm)of a downstream end of the inner support structure.

Inner support structure 102 includes a downstream section 112, and anupstream section 116. Inner support structure 102 is typicallynon-cylindrical. In accordance with respective applications, downstreamsection 112 of inner support structure 102 is formed in a straightfashion (i.e., cylindrical and parallel to the longitudinal axis ofprosthesis 100), or in a flared fashion (i.e., diverging away from thelongitudinal axis of prosthesis 100). Upstream section 116 of the innersupport structure typically curves outwardly from the longitudinal axisof the prosthesis, such that the upstream section has a cross-sectionalarea that is greater than the cross-sectional area of downstream section116. The upstream section of the inner support structure is typicallywider than the native valve segment at the native annular level.

Typically, the non-cylindrical shape of the inner support structurefacilitates the anchoring and/or orientation of the mitral valveprosthesis at the desired implantation site. In particular, the upstreamsection of the inner support structure being wider than the native valvesegment at the native annular level prevents the mitral valve prosthesisfrom being dislodged downstream of native mitral valve complex 128. Thisis achieved, because in response to downstream-directed blood flowpushing the valve prosthesis in a downstream direction, tissue of nativemitral valve complex 128 exerts an upstream-directed force F2 (shown inFIG. 1B) on the upstream section of the inner support structure.

For some applications, the upstream section of the inner supportstructure being wider than the native valve segment at the nativeannular level improves sealing of prosthesis 100 against the atrialwall. For some applications, the inner support structure additionallyexerts a radially-directed force on tissue of native mitral valvecomplex 128 that facilitates the anchoring and/or orientation of theprosthetic valve at the desired implantation site. For someapplications, upstream section 116 of the inner support structure exertsthe radially-directed force on tissue of native mitral valve complex128.

Typically, when valve prosthesis 100 is implanted in native mitral valvecomplex 128, there are variations with time in the mechanical stressexerted on the inner support structure, caused by anatomical andpathological variations of surrounding structures. For someapplications, relative to a more cylindrically-shaped inner supportstructure, non-cylindrical inner support structure resists changes inits shape due to mechanical stress that is exerted on the inner supportstructure. Typically, by resisting changes in its shape, the innersupport structure facilitates the proper functioning of prosthetic valve118.

Typically, inner support structure 102 is expandable (e.g.,self-expandable). For example, the inner support structure may be formedof a memory alloy, such as nitinol, or another biocompatible metal.Similarly, outer support structure 104 may be formed of a memory alloy,such as nitinol, or another biocompatible metal. In accordance withrespective applications, inner support structure 102 and outer supportstructure 104 are integrally formed, or comprise separate modularcomponents that are attached to one another, as described in furtherdetail hereinbelow.

For some applications, inner support structure 102 is designed to flexand deform in response to the natural cardiac movements of the heartthrough the cardiac cycle. Alternatively, inner support structure 102 isgenerally rigid, to avoid flexing or deformation during the cardiaccycle.

For some applications, inner support structure 102 includes one or moresections that are configured to expand to a restricted or presetdiameter rather than expanding until restrained by surroundinganatomical structures. Thus, a portion of (or the entirety of) innersupport structure 102 may have a predetermined configuration,irrespective of the surrounding anatomy. Typically, the predeterminedconfiguration is such that the support structure expands so as to comeinto contact with the tissue of the native valve complex, but does notexert substantial pressure on the tissue of the native valve complex.For some applications, the controlled expansion diameter of the innersupport structure improves the valve geometry, relative to a mitralvalve prosthesis having an inner support structure that expands untilrestrained by the surrounding anatomy. Typically, at least a portion ofinner support structure 102 (and further typically, all of the innersupport structure) expands until restrained by the surrounding anatomy.

As shown (in FIGS. 1A, 1C and 1D, for example), for some applications,downstream section 112 and upstream section 116 of inner supportstructure 102 include generally-diamond-shaped cells 103, which aredescribed in further detail hereinbelow, with reference to FIG. 3.Alternatively, other shapes and configurations of the cells 103 areemployed, for example, as described hereinbelow. For some applications,the locations of junctions of members of a cell with those of adjacentcells are positioned asymmetrically, and/or cells are shapedasymmetrically. For some applications, structural members of the cellsare shaped curvilinearly. Alternatively, structural members of the cellsare formed in a generally zigzag configuration to form symmetrical orasymmetrical cells. For some applications, using structural members thatare shaped in a zigzag configuration distributes the stress associatedwith radial expansion and contraction of the support member to aplurality of points between junctions. In accordance with respectiveapplications, the inner support structure includes heterogeneouspatterns of cells, or homogeneous patterns, or both.

Typically, the ratio of the cell height (H) to cell width (W) (H and Wshown in FIGS. 1A and 1C) of cells 103 is greater than 0.5:1 and/or lessthan 3:1, e.g., 0.5:1 to 3:1. For example, the ratio may be greater than1.5:1 and/or less than 2.5:1, e.g. 1.5:1 to 2.5:1. For example, theratio may be greater than 1.75:1 and/or less than 2.25:1, e.g., 1.75:1to 2.25:1. For some applications, having cells having the aforementionedratios of cell height to cell width facilitates the expansion and/or themaintenance of the structure of inner support structure 102.

Reference is now made to FIGS. 2A-D, which are schematic illustrationsof respective views of mitral valve prosthesis 100, in accordance withsome applications of the present invention. For some applications, alength L2 (shown in FIG. 2B) of an anterior engagement arm 106A isgreater than a length L3 of a posterior engagement arm 106P. For someapplications, the different lengths of the anterior and posteriorengagement arms correspond to the anatomy of most people, most peoplehaving a native anterior mitral valve leaflet having a greater lengththan their native posterior mitral valve leaflet. In all other aspects,the mitral valve prosthesis shown in FIGS. 2A-D is generally similar tothe mitral valve prosthesis described with reference to FIGS. 1A-D.

Typically, length L2 of the anterior engagement arm is greater than 2 mmand less than 35 mm, e.g., 15 mm to mm. Further typically, length L3 ofthe posterior engagement arm is greater than 2 mm and less than 35 mm,e.g., 7 mm to 23 mm. Still further typically, for applications in whichthe anterior and posterior engagement arms have different lengths, theratio of the length of the anterior engagement arm to the length of theposterior engagement arm is greater than 1.1:1, and/or less than 15:1,e.g., 1.3:1 to 2:1.

Reference is now made to FIG. 3, which is a schematic illustration ofinner support structure 102 of mitral valve prosthesis 100, inaccordance with some applications of the present invention. As shown inFIG. 3, for some applications, cells 103 of the inner support structurehave respective characteristics at different longitudinal locationsalong the inner support structure.

For some applications, downstream section 112 of the inner supportstructure includes cells that have relatively short heights, andrelatively high strut width relative to height. In addition, the cellstypically define relatively high angles. For some applications, cellshaving the aforementioned characteristics provide the downstream sectionof the support structure with a high radial force area to maintaincircularity of the valve, and/or fatigue resistance against highpressure gradients. Typically, the downstream section of the supportstructure is relatively short, so as to minimize protrusion of the innersupport structure into the ventricle beyond the annular plane.

For some applications, upstream section 116 of inner support structureincludes an intermediate section 116A, and an upstream-most section116B, intermediate section 116B being disposed between upstream-mostsection 116A and downstream section 112 of the support structure. Thecells of intermediate section 116A and upstream-most section 116B haverespective characteristics.

Cells 103 of intermediate section 116A typically have relatively shortheights, and relatively high strut width relative to height. Inaddition, the cells typically define relatively high angles. For someapplications, cells having the aforementioned characteristics providethe intermediate section of the support structure with high pinchingresistance. The intermediate section of the support structure istypically shaped so as to facilitate annular sealing on the atrial sideof the mitral valve complex, above the annulus. Alternatively oradditionally, the intermediate section of the support structure isshaped so as to prevent downstream migration of mitral valve prosthesis100.

Cells 103 of upstream-most section 116B typically have large heights.The shape of the cells of the upstream-most portion typically exertrelatively low radial pressure on the surrounding anatomy, such that theupstream-most section of the support structure enhances sealing of thenative valve complex, by conforming to the atrial anatomy. Furthermore,by conforming to the atrial anatomy, the upstream-most section preservesatrial contraction. The upstream-most section of the support structuretypically has a relatively large cross-sectional area, which typicallyprevents downstream migration of mitral valve prosthesis 100.

Reference is now made to FIGS. 4A-F, which are schematic illustrationsof mitral prosthesis 100, in accordance with some applications of thepresent invention. As shown in FIGS. 4A-D, for some applications, innersupport structure 102 of mitral valve prosthesis 100 does not extend tothe downstream end of the prosthesis. For example, as shown, the innersupport structure may extend from an upstream end 120 to substantiallyhalfway between upstream and downstream ends of the prosthesis, suchthat the downstream end of the inner support structure is between 2 mmand 15 mm from downstream ends 119 of prosthetic leaflets 118.Alternatively, inner support structure 102 of mitral valve prosthesis100 does extend substantially to the downstream end of the prosthesis,for example, such that the downstream end of the inner support structureis within 1 mm of downstream ends 119 of prosthetic leaflets 118 (ashown in FIG. 10, for example).

For some applications, outer support structure 104 includes outerengagement arms 106 that are coupled to upstream ends of commissure post108, rather than being coupled to downstream ends of the commissureposts, as described with reference to FIGS. 1A-D. As shown in FIG. 4B,for some applications, commissure post 108 extends downstream from theends of engagement arms 106. For such applications, the downstream endsof commissure posts 108 are level with the ends of prosthetic valveleaflets 118. In all other respects, prosthesis 100 of FIG. 4B isgenerally similar to prosthesis 100 as described hereinabove withreference to FIGS. 1-3.

For some applications, not having the inner support structure extend tothe downstream end of the prosthesis, allows for prosthesis 200 to beconstructed of less material, and/or reduces the weight of prosthesis200.

As shown in FIGS. 4E-F, for some applications, engagement arms 106 andprosthetic valve 118 are coupled to inner support structure 102 suchthat downstream ends 119 of the prosthetic valve leaflets are at alongitudinal distance D2 upstream of the downstream ends 105 of theengagement arms. Thus, prosthesis 100 is configured such that uponimplantation thereof, the downstream end of the inner support structure102 and downstream ends 119 of the prosthetic valve leaflets 118 are ata longitudinal distance D2 upstream of the downstream ends of the nativevalve leaflets 107. Typically, distance D2 is at least 4 mm, e.g., atleast mm. Further typically, upon implantation of the prosthesis,downstream ends of native valve leaflets of the native mitral valvecomplex, and downstream ends 105 of the engagement arms are disposed ata longitudinal distance from one another of less than 3 mm.

Reference is now made to FIGS. 5A-B, which are schematic illustrationsof inner expandable support structure 104 of mitral valve prosthesis100, in accordance with some applications of the present invention. Asshown, for some applications, apices of the inner support structure atthe upstream end of the support structure are rounded. FIG. 5B showsslightly rounded apices, and FIG. 5A shows more rounded apices. For someapplications, using apices that are rounded reduces trauma to the atrialendocardium, and/or enhances local radial stiffness of the inner supportstructure, relative to using an inner support structure having anon-rounded upstream end. For some applications, the downstream end ofthe inner support structure also has rounded cell-apices. In alternativeapplications, the apices of the cells at the downstream end of the innersupport structure are non-rounded (as shown in FIGS. 5A-B), or theapices of the cells at both ends of the inner support structure arenon-rounded (as shown in FIG. 1A).

Reference is now made to FIGS. 6A-D, which are schematic illustrationsof inner expandable support structure 102 of prosthesis 100, inaccordance with some applications of the present invention.

Prosthesis 100 shown in FIGS. 6A-B is generally similar to theprosthesis described hereinabove, the prosthesis including inner supportstructure 102 and outer support structure 104. However, the shape ofinner support structure 102 differs from the shape of inner supportstructure 102 of FIG. 1A. Specifically, upstream section 116 of innersupport structure 102 is formed asymmetrically to accommodate theanterior horn of the atrium (which is associated anatomically with theposition of the aortic valve), as shown in FIG. 6B, which shows theprosthesis implanted inside the subject's heart. For example, as shownin FIG. 6A, the length of prosthesis 100 from downstream section 112 toupstream section 116 is increased at an area corresponding to theanterior horn of the atrium. This area also extends radially fartherfrom the longitudinal axis of the prosthesis, in order to accommodatethe anterior horn. As described hereinabove, upstream section 116 isgenerally wider than the native valve segment at the native annularlevel. Such a configuration prevents migration of prosthesis 100 intothe ventricle and improves sealing of prosthesis 100 against the atrialwall.

For some applications, as shown, downstream section 112 of the innersupport structure has a circular cross-section, while upstream section116 has a non-circular cross-section. Typically, for applications inwhich inner support structure is shaped to accommodate the anterior hornof the atrium, the cross-section of inner support structure 102 is anon-uniform, non-circular shape, for example, a D-shape, or oval.

FIG. 6B is a sagittal cut through a human heart 124 depicting theimplanted mitral valve prosthesis 100 of FIG. 6A. Chordae tendineae 126,which are disposed in left ventricle 127, connect native mitral valve128 to papillary muscles 130. Engagement arms 106 wrap around leaflets107 of native mitral valve 128. As shown in FIG. 6B, upstream section116 has a non-circular, asymmetric shape to accommodate the anteriorhorn of atrium 132, which is associated anatomically with the positionof aortic valve 134. The shape of upstream section 116 facilitates axialfixation, facilitates prevention of outflow obstruction, and/orfacilitates sealing of prosthesis 100 against the wall of left atrium132.

Prosthesis 100 shown in FIGS. 6C-D is generally similar to theprosthesis described hereinabove, the prosthesis including inner supportstructure 102 and outer support structure 104. However, in accordancewith some applications of the invention, upstream section 116 of theinner support structure includes fixation members 190 (e.g., barbs, asshown, hooks, anchors, or clips) to provide further fixation support andto prevent migration of prosthesis 100 into the ventricle.

FIG. 6D is a sagittal cut through a human heart 124, depicting animplanted mitral valve prosthesis 100. As shown in FIG. 6D, upstreamsection 116 has a non-circular, asymmetric shape to accommodate theanterior horn of left atrium 132. The shape of upstream section 116facilitates axial fixation, facilitates prevention of outflowobstruction, and/or facilitates sealing of prosthesis 100 against thewall of left atrium 132. Further, barbs 190 penetrate to the mitralannulus and serve as a locking mechanism to prevent migration ofprosthesis 100 into left ventricle 127.

Reference is now made to FIGS. 7A-F, which are schematic illustrationsof respective steps of a transapical implantation procedure of mitralvalve prosthesis 100 (described hereinabove with reference to any ofFIGS. 1-6), in accordance with some applications of the presentinvention.

As shown in FIG. 7A, a trocar (i.e., an overtube) 730 is inserted intothe left ventricle 127 through an incision created in the apex 724 of apatient's heart 124. A dilator 732 is used to aid in the insertion oftrocar 730. In this transapical approach, the native mitral valve 128 isapproached from the downstream direction. As shown in FIG. 7B,subsequently, trocar 730 is retracted sufficiently to release theself-expanding engagement arms 106 of the mitral valve prosthesis.Typically, dilator 732 is presented between leaflets of valve 128.Trocar 730 can be rotated and adjusted as necessary to align the valveprosthesis so that engagement arms 106 are positioned so as to be placedaround leaflets of native valve 128.

As shown in FIG. 7C, subsequently, trocar 730 and the valve prosthesisare advanced forward, such that outer engagement arms 106 embracewithout squeezing leaflets of native valve 128. As shown in FIG. 7D,subsequently, dilator 732 is advanced into the left atrium to furtherexpose inner support structure 102, and more specifically, to begindisengaging upstream section 116 from dilator 732, FIG. 7E showsupstream section 116 released from dilator 732, and expanded to pressagainst the interior wall of native mitral valve 128, (For someapplications, upstream section 116 does not expand against the interiorwall of the native valve so as to exert a substantial radial force onthe inner wall of the valve. Rather, the upstream section is configuredto prevent the prosthesis from migrating into the left ventricle, asdescribed hereinabove.) Subsequently, trocar 730 is withdrawn from heart124, and the incision in apex 724 is closed, as shown in FIG. 7F.

It is noted that in the transition from FIG. 7C to FIG. 7E, the width W1that is spanned by each of the engagement arms increases. Typically,during placement of the engagement arms on the native valve leaflets,each of the engagement arms spans a width that is less than 12 mm, e.g.less than 8 mm, as shown in FIG. 7C. Typically, this prevents theengagement arms from coming into contact with the papillary muscles,since the engagement arms span a sufficiently narrow width so as to beplaced between the papillary muscles. Further typically, this allows thenative valve to continue functioning at least in part, since there areportions of the leaflets that are outside the engagement arms that maycontinue to open and close, at least partially. Subsequently, theengagement arms expand (typically, due to the expansion of the innersupport structure) such that each of the engagement arms spans a widthof more than 15 mm, e.g., more than 35 mm, as shown in FIG. 7E.

Reference is now made to FIGS. 8A-F, which are schematic illustrationsof respective steps of a transatrial implantation procedure of mitralvalve prosthesis 100 (described hereinabove with reference to any ofFIGS. 1-6), in accordance with some applications of the presentinvention.

As shown in FIG. 8A, dilator 732 and trocar 730 are inserted through anincision 840 made in the wall of the left atrium of heart 124. Dilator732 and trocar 730 are advanced through the native mitral valve 128 andinto the left ventricle of heart 124. As shown in FIG. 8B, subsequently,dilator 732 is withdrawn from trocar 732. Subsequently, a guide wire 842is advanced through trocar 730 to the point where mitral valveprosthesis 100 comes to the end of trocar 730, as shown in FIG. 8C. Asshown in FIG. 8D, subsequently, mitral valve prosthesis 100 is advancedsufficiently to release the self-expanding engagement arms 106 fromtrocar 730. Trocar 730 is typically rotated and adjusted as necessary toproperly align the valve prosthesis with native valve 128. Subsequently,trocar 730 is withdrawn slightly so as to place engagement arms 106around the outside of leaflets of native valve 128, as shown in FIG. 8E.Subsequently, trocar 730 is completely withdrawn from heart 124 suchthat mitral valve prosthesis 100 self-expands into position and assumesthe function of native mitral valve 128, as shown in FIG. 8F.

For some applications (not shown), prosthesis 100 (described hereinabovewith reference to any of FIGS. 1-6) is implanted transseptally. For suchapplications, the prosthesis is advanced via the femoral vein, into theright atrium. An incision is made in the septum of the heart to provideaccess to the left atrium. The prosthesis is then advanced through theincision in the septum and is implanted through a technique similar tothe one described hereinabove with reference to FIGS. 8C-8F. Such amethod typically includes some or all of the following: making anincision in a femoral vein; inserting a trocar through the incision inthe femoral vein and advancing the trocar into the right atrium of theheart; making an incision in the septum of the heart; advancing thetrocar through the incision in the septum of the heart and into the leftatrium; advancing a mitral valve prosthesis through the trocar and intothe left atrium of the heart; advancing the trocar past the nativemitral valve and into the left ventricle of the heart; releasing theengagement arms from the trocar; retracting the trocar such that theengagement arms are placed around the outer surface of the native mitralvalve leaflets; releasing the inner support structure from the trocar;closing the incision in the septum; and withdrawing the trocar from theheart.

Reference is now made to FIG. 9, which is a schematic illustration ofimplanted mitral valve prosthesis 100 (described hereinabove withreference to any of FIGS. 1-6), in accordance with some applications ofthe present invention. Mitral valve prosthesis 100 has engagement arms106 that are placed around leaflets of native valve 128. Typically,downstream ends of engagement arms define a rotational gap. When valveprosthesis 100 is implanted in the native mitral valve, the commissuresof the native mitral valve, and the regions of the native leafletsadjacent to the commissures are squeezed within the gap between the twoends of outer engagement arms 106. The leaflets are squeezed within thegap such that the regions of the anterior and posterior leaflets thatare adjacent to the commissures are squeezed against one another andseal the commisures.

Reference is now made to FIGS. 10A-D, which are schematic illustrationsof engagement arms 106 of mitral valve prosthesis 100, in accordancewith respective applications of the present invention. In accordancewith respective applications, engagement arms 106 form a U-shapedtroughs 110 (FIG. 10A), circular-shaped troughs 111 (FIG. 10B), bulgingflask-shaped troughs 113 (FIG. 100), and/or undulating, bottle-nippleshaped trough 115 (FIG. 10D). For some applications (not shown), theengagement arms are shaped to include two or more parallel arches.

Reference is now made to FIGS. 11A-D, which are schematic illustrationsof outer support structure 104, in accordance with some applications ofthe present invention. FIG. 11A shows a single continuous structure thatincludes engagement arms 106, the engagement arms emerging fromrespective points of a connecting frame 121 of the outer supportstructure. As shown in FIG. 11B, the outer support structure is placedover inner support structure 102, and is coupled to the inner supportstructure. For some applications, using a single continuous structurefrom which the engagement arms emerge ensures that the engagement armsare placed symmetrically on the prosthesis, facilitates assembly of theprosthesis, and/or enhances the overall frame strength of theprosthesis.

As shown in FIG. 11A, for some applications, the engagements armsinclude a leaflet capturing element 123 (e.g., additional struts, asshown) to reduce motion of the native valve leaflets, to immobilize thenative valve leaflets, and/or to prevent systolic anterior motion of theleaflets. Typically, by preventing systolic anterior motion of theleaflets, the engagement arms prevent the native leaflets from blockingor interfering with the LVOT. For some applications, engagement arms106, as described with reference to FIGS. 11A-D, or elsewhere in thepresent application, prevent systolic anterior motion of the nativeleaflets even in the absence of the leaflet capturing element or anyother additional element.

As shown in FIGS. 11C-D, for some applications, the whole of outersupport structure 104 (FIG. 11C), or a portion thereof (FIG. 11D), iscovered with a biocompatible cloth 145 (e.g., polyester). Typically, thecover helps to prevent systolic anterior motion of the native leafletsthrough engagement arms 106, and/or to reduce metal to metal abrasionbetween the outer and inner support structures. For some applications,the cover generally may help capture calcific, thrombotic, or othermaterial which might be dislodged from the native valve or thesurrounding tissue.

Reference is now made to FIG. 12, which is a schematic illustration ofthe mitral valve prosthesis 100, in accordance with some applications ofthe present invention. Prosthesis 100, as shown in FIG. 12, is generallysimilar to prosthesis 100 described hereinabove, except that thedownstream ends of engagement arms 106 of prosthesis 100 as shown inFIG. 12 are connected directly to inner support structure 102. As shownin FIG. 12, engagement arms 106 are attached to inner support structure102 at downstream section 112 of the inner support structure. Inaccordance with some applications, engagement arms 106 are directlyattached to inner support structure 102 at any suitable location,including but not limited to downstream section 112, intermediatesection 116A, and/or upstream-most section 116B (the aforementionedsections typically being as described hereinabove with reference to FIG.3). For some applications, the engagement arms are integrally formedwith the inner support structure.

Reference is now made to FIG. 13, which is a schematic illustration ofmitral valve prosthesis 100, in accordance with some applications of thepresent invention. Prosthesis 100, as shown in FIG. 13, is generallysimilar to prosthesis 100 described with reference to FIG. 12. However,relative to the prosthesis shown in FIG. 12, the prosthesis shown inFIG. 13 includes a shorter downstream section 112 of more than 1 mmand/or less than 20 mm, e.g., 1-20 mm (for example, more than 10 mmand/or less than 14 mm, e.g., 10-14 mm). In addition, relative to theprosthesis shown in FIG. 12, engagement arms 106 of the prosthesis shownin FIG. 13 are attached to inner support structure 102 closer to thedownstream end of the prosthesis. For some applications, use of ashorter prosthesis improves the maneuverability of the prosthesis whenloaded on a delivery catheter, thereby facilitating implantation of suchdevices and reducing the time required to perform the implantationprocedure, relative to the use of a longer prosthesis. For someapplications, use of a shorter prosthesis reduces interference of theprosthesis with the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), relative to alonger prosthesis.

Reference is now made to FIGS. 14A-B, which are schematic illustrationsof portions of mitral valve prosthesis 100, in accordance with someapplications of the present invention. FIGS. 14A-B shows a single outersupport structure 104 that includes engagement arms 106, the engagementarms emerging from respective points of the continuous structure.Connecting frame 123 of the outer support structure includes struts thatare geometrically similar in structure to the corresponding struts onthe inner support structure 102. For some applications, using strutsthat are similar to the corresponding struts on the inner supportstructure enhances the frame strength of the prosthesis, when the innerand outer support structures are coupled to one another.

In accordance with respective applications, engagement arms 106 arecoupled to connecting frame 123 of outer support structure 104, or theengagement arms and the connecting frame form a single continuousstructure. As described hereinabove with reference to FIGS. 11A-B, forsome applications, using a single continuous structure from which theengagement arms emerge ensures that the engagement arms are placedsymmetrically on the prosthesis, facilitates assembly of the prosthesis,and/or enhances the overall frame strength of the prosthesis.

As shown in FIG. 14B, for some applications, at least a portion of outersupport structure 104 is covered with a biocompatible cloth 145 (e.g.,polyester). Typically, the cover helps to prevent systolic anteriormotion of the native leaflets through engagement arms 106, and/or toreduce metal to metal abrasion between the outer and inner supportstructures. For some applications, the cover generally may help capturecalcific, thrombotic, or other material which might be dislodged fromthe native valve or the surrounding tissue.

Reference is now made to FIGS. 15A-B, which are schematic illustrationsof mitral valve prosthesis 100, in accordance with some applications ofthe present invention. For some applications, during the construction ofthe mitral valve prosthesis, engagement arms 106 are cut as integralparts of inner support structure 102. Engagement arms 106 are foldedinto position with respect to inner support structure 102 using heattreatment, FIG. 15B shows the engagement arms having been folded intoposition, with respect to the inner support structure.

Features of mitral valve prosthesis 100 described with reference torespective figures are not limited to the prostheses shown in thosefigures. Rather, features of the prosthesis shown in any of the figurescould be used in combination with any of the other features describedherein, mutatis mutandis. Examples of the features that may be combinedwith each other include, but are not limited to:

-   -   structures of the cells of inner support structure 102    -   asymmetrical engagement arms 106 of FIGS. 2A-D,    -   the features of inner support structure 102 and outer support        structure 104 described with reference to FIGS. 4A-F    -   the features of inner support structure 102 described with        reference to FIGS. 5A-B    -   the asymmetric inner support structure, and fixation barbs of        the inner support structure, as described with reference to        FIGS. 6A-D    -   features of the outer support structure, and/or the engagement        arms described with reference to FIGS. 9-15B.

Further, any of the surgical techniques described herein can be used forimplantation of prosthesis 100, including but not limited to, methods ofimplanting the mitral valve prosthesis transapically, transatrially, andtransseptally, for example, as described hereinabove with reference toFIGS. 7-8.

As used herein, the terms “upstream” and “downstream” are used to referto the upstream and downstream directions of the blood flow when mitralvalve prosthesis 100 is implanted inside the subject's heart. The terms“upstream” and “downstream” should be interpreted as beinginterchangeable, respectively, with the terms “proximal” and “distal.”

The techniques described herein may be combined with the techniquesdescribed in one or more of the following applications, all of whichapplications are incorporated herein by reference:

-   US 2008/0071368 to Tuval-   US 2009/0281618 to Hill-   US 2010-0036479 to Hill

It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the presentinvention is not limited to what has been particularly shown anddescribed hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present inventionincludes both combinations and subcombinations of the various featuresdescribed hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereofthat are not in the prior art, which would occur to persons skilled inthe art upon reading the foregoing description.

The invention claimed is:
 1. Apparatus comprising a mitral valveprosthesis for implantation at a native mitral valve complex of asubject, the prosthesis comprising: an inner support structure having adownstream section and an upstream section, the upstream section havinga cross-sectional area greater than the downstream section, the innersupport structure being configured to be positioned at least partiallyon an atrial side of the native valve complex, and to prevent theprosthesis from being dislodged into a left ventricle by applying anaxial force directed toward the left ventricle; a prosthetic valvehaving prosthetic valve leaflets coupled to the inner support structure;and an outer support structure coupled to the inner support structure,the outer support structure having more than two arms, wherein the morethan two arms of the outer support structure extend in an upstreamdirection, are disposed radially outside of the inner support structure,and at least partially overlap the inner support structure, wherein afirst arm of the more than two arms is longer than a second arm of themore than two arms, and wherein at least the first arm is configured toclamp portions of leaflets of the native valve between the inner supportstructure and the first arm.
 2. The apparatus according to claim 1,wherein for the first arm, along at least 30% of a length of the firstarm, the first arm is at a distance of at least 0.5 mm from an outersurface of the inner support structure.
 3. The apparatus according toclaim 2, wherein the distance is at least 1 mm.
 4. The apparatusaccording to claim 3, wherein the distance is at least 4 mm.
 5. Theapparatus according to claim 2, wherein the first arm is at the distancefrom the outer surface of the inner support structure along at least 50%of the length of the first arm.
 6. The apparatus according to claim 5,wherein the first arm is at the distance from the outer surface of theinner support structure along at least 70% of the length of the firstarm.
 7. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the outer supportstructure comprises a connecting frame, the connecting frame of theouter support structure being configured to be coupled to the innersupport structure.
 8. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein theprosthesis is configured, upon implantation thereof, to reduce motion ofthe native valve leaflets, by holding the leaflets inside the engagementarms.
 9. The apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the prosthesis isconfigured to immobilize the native valve leaflets, by holding theleaflets inside the engagement arms.
 10. The apparatus according toclaim 8, wherein the prosthesis is configured to prevent systolicanterior motion of the native valve leaflets, by holding the leafletsinside the engagement arms.
 11. The apparatus according to claim 8,wherein the prosthesis is configured to prevent the native leaflets frominterfering with LVOT, by holding the leaflets inside the engagementarms.
 12. The apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the outer supportstructure further comprises biocompatible cloth covers for covering thearms, the biocompatible cloth covers being configured to reduce themotion of the native leaflets.